<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CRX1.COM &#187; cr-z hybrid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crx1.com/tag/cr-z-hybrid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crx1.com</link>
	<description>1984 - 1985 Honda CRX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:09:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Was it worth waiting 20 years?</title>
		<link>http://crx1.com/2010/01/22/was-it-worth-waiting-20-years/</link>
		<comments>http://crx1.com/2010/01/22/was-it-worth-waiting-20-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Honda News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CR-X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cr-z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cr-z hybrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crz hybrid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crx1.com/wp/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The production version of the Honda CR-Z took the stage at the Detroit Auto Show. Many had high hopes for what claims to be the &#8216;spiritual successor&#8217; to the original CRX. I had high hopes because I was ready to buy one as soon as it becomes available for sale. But after reviewing the specs, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The production version of the Honda CR-Z took the stage at the Detroit Auto Show. Many had high hopes for what claims to be the &#8216;spiritual successor&#8217; to the original CRX. I had high hopes because I was ready to buy one as soon as it becomes available for sale. But after reviewing the specs, I wasn&#8217;t too thrilled. Not much power yet not great on gas either (our CRXs get more mpg). I&#8217;m sure the thing will be much, much heavier than our cars. Thus, I <em>know</em> it needs more power than 122hp and 128 lb-ft of torque. It looks nice but the rest of the car doesn&#8217;t break any new grounds. They say it will be sold as Base or EX. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll see the Si version in year or two. I really hope the Si version is worth the wait.<br />
</p>
<div>
<img src="http://i618.photobucket.com/albums/tt265/ykcom/crx1/blog/crz/crz3.jpg" alt="Honda CR-Z" />
</div>
<p>
Read more about the CR-Z <a href="http://usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/cars-trucks/Honda_CR-Z/"> here </a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crx1.com/2010/01/22/was-it-worth-waiting-20-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
 
