<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2011 CR-Z vs. 1987 CRX Si</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crx1.com/2010/07/20/2011-crx-z-vs-1987-crx-si/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crx1.com/2010/07/20/2011-crx-z-vs-1987-crx-si/</link>
	<description>1984 - 1985 Honda CRX</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhiar JJ</title>
		<link>http://crx1.com/2010/07/20/2011-crx-z-vs-1987-crx-si/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhiar JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crx1.com/?p=189#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I test drove the CR-Z today it was pretty good imo considering that it is a hybrid. And it looks much nicer in person. Yes, different car but he CR-Z is beautiful in its own right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I test drove the CR-Z today it was pretty good imo considering that it is a hybrid. And it looks much nicer in person. Yes, different car but he CR-Z is beautiful in its own right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bama Rick</title>
		<link>http://crx1.com/2010/07/20/2011-crx-z-vs-1987-crx-si/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Bama Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crx1.com/?p=189#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Agreed, and that &#039;87 is absolutely beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, and that &#8217;87 is absolutely beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
 
